How to investigate the crash of the aircraft TU 154. Military pensioners for Russia and its armed forces

Experts of the Ministry of Defense came to the conclusion that the plane crashed over the Black Sea due to the possible error of the second pilot, confused control levers, as well as low height and overload.

After fully deciphering the black boxes of a breakdown in late December 2016, in the water area of \u200b\u200bSochi Tu-154 - parametric and speech - Experts of the Ministry of Defense actually can already immediately call the causes of the aircraft crash. According to experts, the aircraft with passengers joined the totality of several factors: boardwent to last flight overloaded and second pilot Alexander Rovnskyon take-off, perhapsinterpreted chassis control levers and flaps. When the crew noticed a mistake, it was already too late: severe Tu-154 simply did not have enough height for the saving maneuver, so hehit about the water by the tail of the fuselage and collapsed.

Heavy and unmanageable

Source of a Life, familiar with the course of investigating the causes of the catastrophe, told that the notorious human factor It is recognized as a priority version of the Tu-154 wreck.

Experts of the Research Center of Operation and Repair of the Ministry of Defense of the Ministry of Defense in Lyubertsy, the speech and parametries (fixing the work of all units of the aircraft) of the recorder say that in the third minute of flight, when the liner was at an altitude of 450 meters above sea level, the sensors of the course stability system were worked out, - told Life source. - The car began to dramatically lose height due to problems with flaps.

According to experts, it could happen after the second pilot, 33-year-old captain Alexander Rovnsky, instead of removing the chassis, removed the flap.

From this, the plane passed into an expulsive angle of attack, the crew tried to deploy the car to reach the ground, but did not have time to do this, he added the source of the Life.

As it turned out, the situation aggravated the overload Tu-154. In the luggage compartment, everything was filled under the urban. The tail of the aircraft pulled down. It was impossible to save the car: lacked speeds and heights.The tail part of the first touched the water, and then Tu-154at high speedi hit the sea with the right wing and collapsed.

According to the source of the Life, the emergency situation became a complete surprise for the crew: in the first seconds, the aircraft commander 35-year-old Major Roman wolves and the second pilot Alexander Rovnsky was confused, but quickly took themselves in hand and before recent Seconds Tried to save the aircraft.

Decoding:

Speed \u200b\u200b300 ... (Illegible.)

- (Illegible.)

He took the racks, commander.

- (Illegible.)

Wow, e-mine!

(Sound signal sounds.)

Floor, bitch, what is x ** nya!

Altimeter!

Us... (Illegible.)

(Signal sounds about dangerous rapprochement from Earth.)

- (Illegible.)

Commander, we fall!

So experts realized that the aircraft had problems with closeds precisely by the fault of the crew.

Pilots flying on Tu-154, with whom Life touched, confirm the findings of the experts of the Ministry of Defense that the cause of the catastrophe could be the error of pilots.

Tupolev, the handles of cleaning the chassis and closes are made on the visor of the cockpit of pilots, between them, above the windshield. You can confuse them, especially if the second pilot sitting on the right, the duties of which include the control of closed and the chassis during the takeoff, tired, "said Viktor Sazhenin Honored pilot, who himself flew to Tu-154, told Life. "From this, the plane moved to the shipyard angle of attack, hit the water, and he fell off the tail part.

This version considers the permissible and pilot test of the hero of Russia Magomed Tolbeev.

On the control panel Tu-154, flaps and chassis tumblers are located above the windshield. Flare - left, chassis - right. The second pilot is responsible for them, which sits in the chair on the right. It is possible that the pilot could confuse the levers or distracting with something, so the plane took off with the chassis released and the closed places, "Tolbeev told Life.

According to Tolbaeva, it is impossible to exclude such a version that after the takeoff crew exceeded the speed and the closure mechanism collapsed, because of which the liner fell to the right, lost speed and collapsed into the water.

Tragic experience

Another factor of the Tu-154 catastrophe in Sochi could be the absence of sufficient knowledge commander and the second pilot, how to act in an extreme situation.

"src \u003d" https: //static..jpg "alt \u003d" "Data-Extra-Description \u003d" "\u003e

Catastrophe with Tu-154 b-2 with on-board number RA-85572 The Ministry of Defense occurred on December 25, 2016. It was at 5:40 am Moscow time 1.7 kilometers from the coast of Sochi. The board of the Ministry of Defense flew into the Syrian Hmeimim from the airfield Chkalovsky, and in Sochi he only refuel. On board the liner was 92 people. A few minutes after the cut from the strip, the plane disappeared from radar screens.

A broken liner was based on the Chkalovsky airfield near Moscow and was part of the FGBU "State Airlines 223rd Falls" of the Ministry of Defense, which carries out the transport of military personnel.

The modification of Tu-154 B-2 is designed to transport 180 passengers of the economic class and produced from 1978 to 1986. A total of 382 aircraft were built. Since 2012, Russian civil air carriers are not exploited by Tu-154 B-2.

The network appeared the results of the investigation of the Tu-154 wreck over the Black Sea. According to the published information, the cause of the tragedy was the crew fatigue.

"The cause of the Tu-154-B-2 disaster was a violation of the spatial orientation (situational awareness) of the aircraft commander, which led to its erroneous actions with the aircraft control bodies, as a result of which the aircraft at the stage of a set of height moved to a decrease and ran into a water surface" , "Said in the report published in the Telegram channel" Captain Lunners ". The document is noted "the absence of an adequate reaction of the aircraft captain" on the reports of crew members, as well as sound and light signals.

A violation of spatial orientation was facilitated by several factors: excessive mental stress, emotional and physiological fatigue and deficit of the skills of the distribution of attention from the captain. The tragedy also led the lack of compulsory control over the flight execution by the military command.

"Military transport aviation was not ready for large-scale challenges that in front of it set the task of organizing a continuous air bridge to Syria. Problem in a complex, a lack of prepared crews, an outdated system of preparation and control, the density relationship of the command to the regime of labor and recreation crews", - noted by the author of the Telegram channel.

The report provides a list of violations made on the military base when preparing the departure of Tu-154. For example, the crew was equipped with different squadrons, there was no radio operator in its composition - on-board translator. For pilots, there were no classes and training, and they passed the medical examination earlier than two hours before departure.

Experts added that during refueling Tu-154, the landing and disembarkation of passengers was not produced, the additional cargo on board was not posted. The problems arose at the seventh second flight, since the captain "experienced difficulties in determining its location on the territory of the airfield related to his submission of the take-off course."

Recall that the collapse of the Tu-154 of the Ministry of Defense occurred on December 25, 2016 not far from Sochi. The plane collapsed into the Black Sea. All those who were on board 92 people were killed, including journalists of federal channels, head of the Fundamental Help Foundation Elizabeth Glinka, as well as the head and artists of the Aleksandrov ensemble.

The Commission of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation completed the investigation into the circumstances of the Tu-154 crash during takeoff from the airfield in Sochi on December 25, 2016. The main conclusion: the cause of the tragedy was erroneous actions of the crew commander, which could not be navigated in space and situation.

Photos of the Printed Report of the Commission appointed by order of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Sergey Shoigu to investigate the circumstances and causes of the Catastrophe of the Tu-154 B-2 of the 800th Special Aviation Base, which happened on December 25, 2016 in the area of \u200b\u200bthe Sochi airfield, published on Wednesday, May 31 , Telegram Channel "Captain Lunners".

The document is commemorated, and at the end and perceiver restores the entire last flight of the aircraft. Take off from the airfield "Chkalovsky" was carried out at 1 h 38 minutes. At 3 h 43 min. MSC The crew made a technical landing in Sochi to refuel. Landing and disembarking passengers was not carried out. Apparently, before that, everything went regularly. However, when departing from Sochi, the problem began on Earth.

"After launch, in the process of driving a car of accompaniment, the aircraft commander (KVC) experienced difficulties in determining its location on the territory of the airfield associated with his idea of \u200b\u200bthe upcoming course of the takeoff. These difficulties were due to a complex system of taxiways and the presence of two runways on the airfield. The runway), "says the Commission's report. It is somewhat strange, since it was previously reported that the commander of the vessel Major Roman Volkov repeatedly made flights to Syrian Latakia, including from Sochi airfield.

At 5 h 24 min. 36 seconds. The crew began to take off. "A special situation arose at 5 h. 24 minutes. 42.8s, for 7 seconds. Flight, at a speed of 70 km / h, when the FCC emotionally began to request the crew about the take-off course. Maintaining an unidentified radio exchange with the use of abnormative vocabulary and increasing emotional stress in The crew at the runway stage led to the omission of the KVC of control of significant take-off parameters, divert the crew members from the fulfillment of functional duties at this stage of the flight, "the Events of the Commission members restore.

Next, everything went even worse. For some reason, "on the 53rd s. Flight, to the retreat from the flap to the height of the cleaning of closes (500 m), the FCC at an altitude of 157 m filed a team to clean the closures," the investigators of the Ministry of Defense write. "As a result of the Action of the FCM, the control bodies in the process of take-off at an altitude of 231 m at a speed of 360 km / h passed to a decrease with a decrease in vertical overload to a value of less than 1 unit. At the same time, the ship's assault on the exhalation said:" Wow, E-Moy! " .

Then the siren worked and the red scoreboard was highlighted "DANGER: Earth!". The crew reported to the commander about these signals, that the plane decreases, but it was no longer possible to prevent the vessel's collision with the surface of the sea. In 5h. 25 min. 49 seconds, on the 73rd second, the aircraft hit the water and completely collapsed. The crew and all passengers died.

The cause of the Catastrophe of the Tu-154 aircraft "was a violation of the spatial orientation (situational awareness) of the aircraft commander, which led to its erroneous actions with the aircraft control bodies, as a result of which the aircraft at the stage of a set of height moved to a decrease and ran into a water surface." Such conclusions came members of the Investigative Commission. In turn, the disturbed orientation of the pilot in space and the situation, in their opinion, could be a consequence of "excessive neuropsychic stress", which arose against the background of professional stress and natural fatigue.

At the same time, the Commission revealed massive violations in the work of the 800th aircraft base and military transport aviation as a whole: the actuation activities were not conducted, the situational briefing was not, and even the control over the health of pilots was held more than two hours before departure .

As a result, the tragedy, which killed 92 people, including the head and artists of the Aleksandrov ensemble, heads of the Fund "Fair Help" Elizabeth Glinka, journalists.

Above the Black Sea, it became 73rd in account by the liner of this family lost as a result aviation incidents. The total number of those killed in such incidents over 44 years reached 3 thousand. 263 people. The Yuga.ru portal looked down in the history of the aircraft operation and remembered the largest catastrophes with his participation.

Tu-154 is a passenger aircraft developed in the 1960s in the USSR in the Design Bureau of Tupolev. It was intended for the needs of medium length airlines and for a long time was the most massive Soviet reactive passenger aircraft.

The first flight carried out on October 3, 1968. Tu-154 serially was produced from 1970 to 1998. From 1998 to 2013, in the Samara Plant "Aviakor" carried out small-sector production of modification of Tu-154m. A total of 1026 cars were manufactured. Until the late 2000s was one of the most common aircraft on medium-range routes in Russia.

The aircraft with the onboard number RA-85572, who failed a catastrophe on December 25, 2016 over the Black Sea, was made in 1983 and belonged to the modification of Tu-154B-2. This modification was produced from 1978 to 1986: an economy-class salon, designed for 180 passengers, improved automatic on-board control system. In 1983, the RA-85572 board was transferred to the USSR Air Force.

According to some Tu-154 pilots, the plane is overly complicated for mass passenger liner and requires high qualifications of both flight and terrestrial personnel.

At the end of the 20th century, the plane designed in the 1960s is morally outdated, and the airline began to replace it with modern analogues - Boeing 737 and Airbus A320.

In 2002, the EU countries due to inconsistencies in the level of permissible noise banned Tu-154 flights that are not equipped with special noise-absorbing panels. And since 2006, all flights of Tu-154 (except for the modification of Tu-154m) in the EU were finally prohibited. Airplanes of this type at the time were operated mainly in the CIS countries.

In the mid-2000s, the plane began to gradually derived from operation. The main reason is the low fuel efficiency of the engines. Since the aircraft was designed in the 1960s, the issue of engine efficiency before developers was not stood. Economic crisis 2008 also contributed to the acceleration of the process of plane output from exploitation. In 2008, the entire Park Tu-154 was derived by the company S7, next year they did "Russia" and "Aeroflot". In 2011, the operation of Tu-154 stopped " Ural Airlines" In 2013, the liners of this type were brought from the air park by Utair, the largest Tu-154 operator.

In October 2016, the last demonstration flight took board the Belarusian airline Belavia. The only commercial operator of Tu-154 aircraft in Russia in 2016 was the airline "Alrosa", which has two Tu-154m aircraft in its fleet. According to unconfirmed data, two aircraft Tu-154, including the most old model This family, released back in 1976, owns North Korean airlines Air. Koryo.

In February 2013, mass production of liners was discontinued. The last plane of the family, published at the Aviakor Samara Plant, was transferred to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

The largest catastrophes of domestic Tu-154

02/19/1973, Prague, 66 dead

The Tu-154 aircraft performed a regular passenger flight from Moscow to Prague, when, having landed, suddenly passed into a rapid decline, not a one of 470 m to the runway, crashed into the ground and collapsed. 66 people were killed out of 100 on board. This is the first incident in the history of the Tu-154 aircraft. The Czechoslovak Commission could not establish the causes of the incident, only suggesting that when entering the landing, the airliner unexpectedly fell into the turbulence zone, which led to the loss of sustainability. The Soviet Commission came to the opinion that the cause of the catastrophe was the error of the aircraft commander, which, if approaching landing, accidentally, due to the imperfection of the control system, changed the angle of inclination of the stabilizer.

07/08/1980, Alma-Ata, 166 dead, 9 wounded on earth

The plane, which, on the route Almaty - Rostov-on-Don - Simferopol, fell almost immediately after takeoff. The aircraft demolished two residential barracks and four residential buildings, as a result of which nine people were injured on Earth. By official version, the catastrophe occurred due to a sudden atmospheric perturbation that caused a powerful downward air flow (up to 14 m / s) and a strong backway wind (up to 20 m / s) during takeoff, at the time of mechanization cleaning, with high weighting weight, in high-altitude conditions Airfield and high air temperature. The combination of these factors at a low flight altitude and with a suddenly occurred lateral roll, the correction of which briefly distracted the crew, predetermined the fatal outcome of the flight.

11/16/1981, Norilsk, 99 dead

The liner completed the passenger flight from Krasnoyarsk and went to the landing when he lost height and landed on the field, not about 500 m to the strip, after which she crashed into a mound of the radio beacon and collapsed. 99 people from 167 were killed on board. According to the Commission, the cause of the catastrophe was the loss of the longitudinal control of the aircraft at the final stage of the landing approach due to the design features of the aircraft. In addition, the crew understood too late that the situation threatens an accident, and the decision to leave the second round was made non-advocate.

12/23/1984, Krasnoyarsk, 110 dead

The liner was supposed to perform a passenger flight to Irkutsk, when the engine fails when the height occurred. The crew made the decision to return, but when entering the landing, there was a fire that destroyed the control system. The car collapsed on Earth 3 km to the runway No. 29 and collapsed. The root cause of the catastrophe was the destruction of the disk of the first stage of one of the engines, which occurred due to the presence of fatigue cracks. Cracks were caused by a production defect.

07/10/1985, Uchkuduk, 200 dead

This catastrophe has become the largest number of dead in history soviet aviation and aircraft Tu-154. Airliner, performed regular flight On the route Karshi - Ufa - Leningrad, 46 minutes after departure at an altitude of 11 thousand 600 m lost speed, fell into a flat corkscrew and collapsed to the ground.

According to an official conclusion, it happened when the high non-standard outdoor air temperature is influenced, the small reserve at the corner of the attack and thrust of the engines. The crew made a number of deviations from the requirements, lost speed - and did not cope with the piloting of the aircraft. Widespread informal version: Before the departure, the crew recreation was disturbed, with the result that the total time wakefulness of pilots was almost 24 hours. And shortly after the start of the flight, the crew fell asleep.

07.12.1995, Khabarovsk region, 98 dead

The airliner Tu-154B-1 Khabarovsk United Airlines, which made the flight on the route Khabarovsk - Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk - Khabarovsk - Ulan-Ude - Novosibirsk, crashed into Mount Bo-Jaus 274 km from Khabarovsk. The cause of the catastrophe is supposedly asymmetric fuel pumping from the tanks. The ship commander mistakenly increased the resulting right roll, and the flight became uncontrollable.

07/04/2001, Irkutsk, 145 dead

When entering the landing at the airport of Irkutsk, the airliner suddenly fell into a flat corkscrew and collapsed to the ground. In the process of landing, the crew made a drop in the aircraft speed below the permissible 10-15 km / h. The autopilot included in the height maintenance mode, with a drop of speed increased the pitch angle, which led to even greater loss of speed. Having found a dangerous situation, the crew added the mode of engines, rejected the helvelery left and on myself, which led to a rapid growth of vertical speed and increasing the roll to the left. Having lost the spatial orientation, the pilot tried to bring the plane from the roll, but with his actions only increased it. The State Commission called the cause of the catastrophe erroneous acts of the crew.

10/4/2001, Black Sea, 78 dead

The airliner Tu-154M Airlines Siberia performed the flight along the route Tel Aviv - Novosibirsk, but 1 hour 45 minutes after the take-off collapsed into the Black Sea. According to the conclusion of the Interstate Aviation Committee, the aircraft was unintended to be shot down by the Ukrainian anti-aircraft missile C-200, launched during the Ukrainian military exercises held at the Crimean Peninsula. The Minister of Defense of Ukraine Alexander Kuzmuk brought apologized for what happened. President of Ukraine Leonid Kuchma admitted the responsibility of Ukraine for the incident and dismissed the Minister of Defense.

08/24/2004, Kamensk, 46 dead

The plane flew out of Moscow and took the course to Sochi. During the flight over the Rostov region, a strong explosion occurred in the tail part of the liner. The plane lost control and began to fall. The crew was trying to keep the plane in the air with all their might, but the unmanaged liner collapsed to the ground in the village of the village of Deep Kamensky district Rostov region And completely collapsed. An explosion on the plane arranged a suicide terrorist. Immediately after the terrorist attacks (on the same day, the Tu-134 aircraft exploded, which carried out the flight Moscow - Volgograd) the responsibility for them was assumed to themselves the terrorist organization "Brigade of Islambuli". But later Shamil Basayev said that the attacks prepared.

According to Basayev, the terrorists sent to them did not explode aircraft, but only captured them. Basayev argued that the aircraft were shot down by rockets of the Russian air defense, as Russia's leadership feared that aircraft would be aimed at any facilities in Moscow or St. Petersburg.

08/22/2006, Donetsk, 170 dead

The Russian airliner performed the planned passenger flight from Anapa to St. Petersburg, but over the Donetsk region collided with a strong thunderstorm. The crew requested the dispatcher at a higher flight echelon, but then the airliner lost her height, and after three minutes, the village of dry beam in Konstantinovsky district of the Donetsk region crashed.

"The lack of control over the flight rate and non-fulfillment of indication of the RLE (flight operating guidelines) to prevent the aircraft to fall into the dumping regime during unsatisfactory interaction in the crew did not allow to prevent the transition of a situation into catastrophic"- it was said in the final conclusion of the Interstate Aviation Commission.

04/10/2010, Smolensk, 96 dead

The Presidential Airliner Tu-154m of the Poland Air Force performed the flight along the route Warsaw - Smolensk, but when entering the airfield at the Smolensk-Northern airfield, the liner ran into the trees, tipped over, collapsed to the ground and completely collapsed. All 96 people who were on board were killed, among them the President of Poland Lech Kaczynski, his wife Maria Kaczynskaya, as well as famous Polish politicians, almost all the highest military command and public and religious figures. They were heading to Russia with a private visit as a Polish delegation to mourning events on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the Katyn execution. Investigation of the Interstate Aviation Committee it was established that all aircraft systems before a collision with the Earth worked normally; Because of the fog, visibility at the airfield was lower than permissible for the landing, which the crew was notified. The causes of the catastrophe were called incorrect actions of the crew of the aircraft and the psychological pressure on it.

According to the official version of the Tu-154 crash in Sochi on December 25, 2016, Orangutang, who became ridiculously pull the control knobs, which led to the tragedy. If you hold a parallel with a car, it would look like this: the driver sat down behind the wheel, moved - and drove into a snowdrift. I passed back - and crushed three cars near. Then I went ahead - and crashed from all the Duri into a trash can, on what the trip and ended.

Conclusion: Or the driver was drunk - or something crashed with the car.

But Tu-154 recorders showed that the aircraft was fully working. And assume that the pilot began take off in the dead on the eyes of other crew members, no suicide - also does not come out. Yes, and his voice on the recorder is absolutely sober.

However, the plane fell - alleged as a result of the inexplicable action of the crew. Or there is still an explanation - but the military leaders are desperately hiding him?

The earliest journalists were excavated that the plane may have been strongly overloaded - from here and all the consequences. Moreover, it was overbilled not in Sochi the airport Adler, where he did an intermediate landing, and in the near Moscow military airfield Chkalovsky, from where he started.

The weight of the extensive cargo is more than 10 tons. However, in Chkalovsky, according to the documents, in this Tu-1542B-2, kerosene was poured on 10 tons less than the full bowl - 24 tons, as a result, the total weight of the aircraft was 99.6 tons. It exceeded the norm of only 1.6 tons - and therefore it was noncritical. The pilot probably noted that the take-off there occurred with Natuhai - but there could be a lot of reasons for this: wind, atmospheric pressure, air temperature.

But in Adler, where the plane sat for refueling - this refueling and played a fatal role. In the tanks of the aircraft, the fuel was already under the plug - up to 35.6 tons, which is why its take-off weight and has become more permissible for 10 more than 10.

And if you take this version with overload, everything further gets the most logical explanation.

The separation of the aircraft from the take-off band Adler occurred at a speed of 320 km / h - instead of the nominal 270 km / h. Further, the rise took place at a speed of 10 meters per second - instead of the usual 12-15 m / s.

And after 2 seconds after the separation from the Earth, the ship's commander Roman wolves pulled the steering wheel, in order to increase the angle of take-off. The fact is that the trajectories of takeoff and landing are strictly defined on each airfield: landing occurs on a more common, takeoff - on the sharper. It is necessary to dilute the height of the take-off and running the liners - without which they constantly threatened the collision in the air.

But an increase in the angle of lifting led to a drop in speed - too heavy aircraft refused to perform this maneuver. Then the pilot probably already understood that he was posted for a certain pig in the form of excess cargo, he gave the steering wheel from himself to stop the rise and thereby dial the speed.

This happened at an altitude of 200 meters - and if the plane remained in this echelon, let the violation of all rules, the tragedy, possibly, would not happen. But the wolves piloted the car outside of its permissible modes - which no one did, because the flights with overload are categorically prohibited. And how the plane behaved under these conditions, it is difficult to imagine. In addition, it is possible that the extra cargo, being poorly fixed, also violated the aircraft centering during the takeoff.

As a result, a light panic arose in the cockpit. Pilots began to clean the flaps ahead of time - to reduce air resistance and due to the faster to dial the speed.

There was a dangerous rapprochement with water, over which the takeoff line was. The speed was already decent - 500 km / h, the wolves sharply took the steering wheel on himself, to raise the plane, at the same time starting the turn - apparently, decided to return to the airfield. Then the irreparable: the plane in response to the actions of the pilot did not go up, and collapsed into the water, scattering from the collision with her fragments ...

Such a scenario, based on the scripts, is absolutely consistent - and looks more likely to delusional explanation to Shoigu, that the pilot de lost the spatial orientation and instead of a set of height began to decline.

When taken over, no spatial orientation from the pilot is not required. Two main instruments in front of him: high speed indicator, it monitors their testimony without being distracted by the views outside the window ...

You can still ask: how did the aircraft be able to break away from the take-off strip? The answer is simple: There is a so-called screen effect, significantly increasing the lifting force of the wings at an altitude of up to 15 meters from the ground. On it, by the way, the concept of springs - semi-breakers, flying within these 15 meters of height with a much larger cargo on board, is founded. aircraft…

Well, now the most important questions.

First: what load was placed in the belly of this - and by whom?

It is clear that these were not the lightweight drugs Dr. Lisa, who flew by this flight, and not an armored personnel carrier: In the passenger plane, there is no wide port for the entry of any technique. This cargo was obviously heavy enough and compact - to enter through the cargo hatch.

And which one can assume that you can anything: boxes with vodka, shells, gold bars, Sobyaninskaya tile ... And why they decided to send not to freight, and the passenger flight - the reasons could also be any. From jagged At the unmanist of martial cargo, covering which they decided to create the most criminal schemes for the removal of the precious metal or other smuggling.

Another question: did the pilots know about this left cargo? For sure! There is no needle in the haystack - and a whole stack that does not hide from the eye. But what exactly was there and what the true weight of this - pilots could not know. This is the army, where the order of the highest rank is above all instructions; And most likely, that order was equipped with some other generous asked - with a hint of all kinds of goats in case of refusal. Under the action of such a rattling mixture, a lot of job crimes is committed today - when a subyerear person is in front of the choice: or to make decently to earn - or stay without work and without pants.

And the famous Russian maybe, too, as they say, no one canceled!

Who ordered? Here, too, there may be a big scatter: from some lieutenant colonel, armament service to Colonel General. Depending on what exactly drove into the aircraft.

In short, in Chkalovsky, the aircraft overload, but compensate for this overload with an incomplete refueling - and the tanks are already poured into the adler. Obviously, the calculation was to fly to Syrian Hmeym (destination) and back on his merry. And the fact that the ship's commander agreed in Adler to these 35.6 tons of fuel, speaks in favor of the fact that he still did not know the real magnitude of the overload. I fly alone - you can still allow a dealement that Chkalov himself marked the beginning in our aviation. But behind the back of Volkova was also their crew of 7 people, and 84 more passengers, including artists of the Aleksandrov ensemble!

The fact that the Ministry of Defense is not just ducky in this matter, and Mightwall hides the truth - they say such facts.

1. The Shoigu version of the "violation of the spatial orientation (situational awareness) of the commander who led to erroneous actions with the aircraft control authorities" does not withstand any criticism. For any pilot, not the fact that with 4000 hours of plaque, like the Volkova, but also with ten fewer, takeoff is the simplest action that does not require any special skills. Here, let's say, landing in complex meteors is a completely different matter. A catastrophe when landing the same Tu-154 from Polish delegations near Smolensk - a typical example of the lack of skill and pilot experience. But when taken on a good plane, no one has ever been crashed.

2. Deciphering the recorders for sure already in the first days after the tragedy gave the entire alignment of the happening. It is appropriate here to the analogy with the same Polish case in 2010: then on the 5th day MAK (Interstate Aviation Committee) issued an exhaustive version of the incident, which was fully confirmed later.

About the Adler Catastrophe Mc Persistently silent for 6 months. On his website, which publishes detailed analysis of all flight accidents - on the subject of the Adler hanging only two short messagesthat the investigation continues. And another meaningful passage:

"To investigate this catastrophe, resources of research and expert institutions have been attracted. Among them, the Interstate Aviation Committee, which has extensive investigation of incidents with aircraft such as Tu-154 and necessary resources to assist in order to accelerate the investigation. At the same time, Mac informs that official comments on this investigation provides exclusively of the Ministry of Defense of Russia. "

That is, read, "our mouths shut up, sorry."

3. Naturally, the Minister of Defense in the first hours, if not a minute after the catastrophe found out which cargo was aboard the broken TU. And inexplicably long searches of the plane of the aircraft who did not add anything to the information of the recorders - they say that he was looking for that the most secret cargo. And not at all the truth, which was clear by the military immediately.

Well, and another question: why the military led by their minister is so hiding this truth? And from whom - from Putin himself or from the people?

Well, so that it is hid from Putin, I doubt very much: he does not look like a person who can edak around the finger. So, hide from the people. So, this truth is such that somehow scary undermining the prestige of our military.

That is, either some lieutenant colonel, a full idiot, loaded into the passenger aircraft what was close in it should not be. And then the shadow on the whole of our army, in which such idiots, which can handle their idioclies of the ensemble of Aleksandrov as their idiocyism.

Either the Colonel-General is involved, which is part of the head - and then, too, shame and stamp: it turns out, through the change of Serdyukov on Shoigu, our army was not cleared of general increasingness?

And the most recent. Remember when we watched the movie "Chapaev" as a child, many of us shouted in the hall: "Chapai, Run!" I also want to spontaneously today, when everything almost became clear with the Adler tragedy, shout to the pilot of the Volkov: "Do not take this cargo! And took - not flying above 200-tons of meters above the sea! "

After all, if you figure it out on a calm mind, which he did not praise the pilot that had fallen into the storm circumstances, he had a chance of salvation. Namely: when overloading the aircraft, do not even try to follow the instruction that obliges it to the removal from the airfield to climb such a height. To break it to the line, scream for this reprimand, even if dismissal - but save it your life and the lives of others. That is, to fly at the minimum height, producing fuel - and when the aircraft weight will decrease in an hour and a half, start the rise.

Another thing that again suggests itself to the mind - if I decided to return to Adler, it is not possible to take a turn with a standard virage to the side roll, which was filled with a plane in the sea, and the so-called "pancake". That is, one wheel of the direction - when the plane remains in horizontal The plane, and the radius of the reversal increases greatly: practically not used in modern aviation maneuver.

Yes, only this chance that this aircraft could save, in the future, would be still ghostly and kill. Suppose, the wolf would be able to get out of the celestial situation given by the organizers of its flight. Then the next time him or his colleague would already be hung no longer than 10, and 15 excess tons of some "unspecified" cargo: because the appetites are growing as their satisfaction. And the tragedy would have happened anyway - not in this case, so in the following, while maintaining its causes.

Give God, as a result of this catastrophe, someone in our armed forces gave someone in our armed forces, putting a cross on the disgraces that led to the inevitable outcome.

Alexander Roslyakov